Sequential Search in Compiler Design

---

---

Sequential Search, also known as linear search, is one of the simplest methods for searching and storing information in lexical tables. Sequential search may not be the most efficient approach for large-scale programs, but it plays an important role in understanding the fundamentals of data organization in compilers.

In this chapter, we will explain the basics of sequential search, see how it works, and highlight its application in compiler design. We will also discuss its advantages and limitations with an example.

What is Sequential Search?

At its core, sequential search is a method of finding an item by checking each entry in a list one by one. If the item exists in the list, then the search stops and its location is returned. Otherwise, the search continues until all the items have been checked.

This process is simple and easy to implement, which makes it a good starting point for small and simple compiler design to search tokens in lexical tables.

How Dees Sequential Search Work in Compiler Design?

Sequential search is often used to check if a token (like a variable name or constant) is already in the lexical table or not. The process is simple −

• Token Scanning − As the compiler reads the source code, it identifies tokens like variable names, constants, or keywords.
• Table Search − The compiler scans the lexical table from start to finish. This is checking each entry to see if the token already exists.
• Add or Use − If the token is found, the compiler uses the information already stored in the table. If the token is not found, it is added to the end of the table.

For example, consider a program which defines a variable x and later reuses it. The compiler uses sequential search to locate x in the table instead of creating a new entry.

Example of Sequential Search in Action

Suppose a lexical table initially contains the following tokens −

{count, sum, total}

Now, let us say the compiler encounters the following lines of code −

int count = 5;
int average = 10;  

Now check how sequential search handles this −

• Encounter count − The compiler searches the table. It finds count. So that no new entry is added.
• Encounter average − The compiler searches the table. Since average is not in the table, it adds average to the table.

The updated table looks like this −

{count, sum, total, average}

Sequential search works perfectly well for a small table like this. Consider the table had thousands of entries, then sequentially scanning each one would become time-consuming.

Advantages of Sequential Search

Sequential search has a few key benefits, especially in certain scenarios:

• Simplicity − The algorithm is straightforward and easy to understand.
• No Special Setup − It does not require any advanced data structures like trees or hash tables.
• Small-Scale Efficiency − For small lexical tables, sequential search can perform adequately.

These points make it a good choice for small or less complex programs.

Limitations of Sequential Search

Sequential search suffers from the following limitations −

• Slow for Large Tables − The time it takes to search grows linearly with the number of entries. This means searching a table with 1000 tokens may need 1000 comparisons in the worst case.
• Redundancy − As tables grow, the sequential search may repeatedly check the same tokens. This will slow down compilation.
• Not Scalable − It is impractical for large-scale programs. There lexical tables may contain tens of thousands of entries.

For example, if a compiler using sequential search had to process a massive codebase, it may spend a significant amount of time just looking up tokens.

Performance of Sequential Search

From the algorithms perspective, the sequential search can be analysed based on the number of comparisons it makes −

• Best Case − The token is found in the first position (O(1)).
• Worst Case − The token is not in the table, so this is requiring the search to scan every entry (O(n), where n is the number of entries in the table).
• Average Case − On average, the search will examine about half the entries (O(n/2)).

For small tables, this performance bay be acceptable. But since n increases, the drawbacks become more apparent.

Real-World Application of Sequential Search

Actually the sequential search is rarely used for symbol tables or large lexical tables in modern compilers. But, it can be useful in −

• Temporary Tables − For short-lived tables with very few entries, such as those used for constants or statement labels.
• Learning Tools − As a beginning for students learning about compiler design they can use this as a tool.
• Debugging − In debugging tools or simple scripting languages, where performance is not a major concern.

For instance, if a small program has only a few variables and constants, sequential search may be all that is needed.

Alternatives to Sequential Search

Sequential search is simple, however there are more efficient alternatives for handling large lexical tables:

• Binary Search Trees − BSTs offer faster lookups, especially when used balanced trees (O(log n) complexity).
• Hash Tables − Hash tables use a hash function to provide near-instant lookups, which makes them ideal for large-scale programs.

We will see these methods in detail in future articles.

Conclusion

Sequential search is a foundational concept that highlights the essence of importance of data organization in compilers. In this chapter, we covered the concept of sequential search and its role in compiler design. Starting with the basics, we explored how sequential search works, its advantages, and its limitations. Through an example, we saw how the compiler scans a lexical table and either reuses or adds tokens.

Sequential search is easy to implement and works well for small tables, but it struggles with scalability and efficiency for larger programs. As programs grow in complexity, it becomes necessary to use more advanced techniques like binary search trees and hash tables to handle the demands of modern compilation.